Connect with us

Entertainment News

“Buzz Online Over” – Estimated cost of davido and chioma’s wedding hall decorations (Watch)

A new video of the hall used for the wedding of music star Davido and his wife Chioma has surfaced online, along with the alleged estimate of the hall’s interior decorations.

The couple’s celebration, held on Tuesday, June 25, 2024, has been the talk of social media, trending under the hashtag #Chivido2024.

The wedding, which was an exclusive event by invitation only, saw the attendance of high-profile figures, including former President Olusegun Obasanjo, the Ooni of Ife, and several state governors.

CHIVIDO24: Estimated cost of Davido and Chioma's wedding hall decorations causes buzz online

A popular Instagram blogger, Tunde Ednut, shared a video showcasing the opulent venue.

“The crowd at the wedding didn’t let us see the beauty of the hall for Chioma and Davido. The hall was just too beautiful. They really spent money on this ish…. This is a decoration meant for only Kings and Queens. 001 for a reason,” Tunde Ednut’s video caption read.

According to a report from Legit.ng, the hall, adorned with stunning chandeliers, intricate table settings, and luxurious décor, was estimated to be worth over N100 million.

Netizens Reactions…

@nonso_steph said: “This one looks classic with no too much colours, more of western decorations.”

@superstarwendu said: “Hanty Sharon own is still my favourite.”

@vaalified“Sharon’s one is still better.

@omosexy143 said: “I prefer this thou! It’s brighter in my own point of view.”

@floxysclothingsandaccessories said: “We love Davido but Sharon decor did it for me sha.”

@chachalinus022 said: “No hate but auntie Sharon’s own was just to unique and classy.”

@mahneill_ said: “Not from a place of hate but Sharon’s own was more beautiful.”

@onyejeagada said: “VDM body odor no allow person see the decoration well.

@po.rtia4781 said: “It’s giving class and maturity “

@lively_vivie said: “Some of you comparing hall na for parlour dem do una wedding oo.”

See below;